Pike & Shot Warfare – 17th Century formations & tactics
Pike and Shot warfare and the clash of Early Modern military theories at the Battle of Edgehill in 1642.
Pike & Shot Warfare – the 17th Century Military Revolution
The Early Modern period was one of great change, not least in military theory and practice. The battle of Edgehill was to witness a clash of the two latest military doctrines in 1642. Many English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh fought for the Protestant cause in the endless Wars of Religion and Thirty Years War in Europe. They brought both doctrines back to England.
The 17th Century saw a military revolution that dominated warfare for the next two and half centuries. Until their defeat at the Battle of Rocroi in 1643, the Spanish imperial tercios were feared as the finest infantry in Europe. However, smaller linear formations of pike and musket – Pike and Shot – progressively replaced these great squares of pike, shot, sword and buckler.
17th Century military formations & tactics
Inspired by classical Roman tactics, the Dutch reforms of Prince Maurice of Nassau brought greater firepower to bear and strength in defence. This saw a return to linear formations.
King Gustavus II Adolphus of Sweden adapted these tactics further to deliver both firepower and offensive mobility. These two military doctrines were to clash on the field of Edgehill.
Pike & Shot Files, Divisions and Companies
Both the Dutch and Swedish models of Pike and Shot warfare were based around groupings of file, division (section), company, battalion and regiment; organisational structures that persist today in the British Army. At its most basic level, men formed files; one man standing behind another.
A Dutch file consisted of eight men, one behind another in 8 ranks. This depth was designed to withstand a charge of pikes and allow continuous volley fire as each rank of musketeers fired and reloaded. The Swedish model of six ranks only was to be adopted by all as the British Civil Wars progressed. This reflected both a lack of manpower and growing professionalism.
Files were grouped under a corporal to form a division (a section today) of either pikemen or musketeers. In practice, the number of files depended on manning. However, 4 files per division was the ideal. The corporal led his right-hand file, with his lansprizado (lance-corporal) leading the left-hand file.
A standard foot company consisted of one pike and two musketeer divisions. It was a mixed grouping capable of independent operations. In theory, a captain’s company comprised 100 rank and file; 32 pikemen and 64 musketeers (including corporals), 2 drummers, a clerk and an armourer. In practice, most parliamentary companies at Edgehill were closer to 70-80.
Invariably, a significant number of non-combatant followers accompanied every company. These were generally women and boys, often wives and sons, as well as prostitutes and orphans. Nehemiah Wharton writes of ‘our knapsack boys’. It is not clear how many boys followed each company during the British Civil Wars. However, the Spanish expected one boy per file.
Pike & Shot Regiments and Battalions
As today, each foot regiment consisted of a number of companies (generally ten in 1642). The regimental colonel, lieutenant-colonel and major each nominally commanded their own (slightly larger) companies. Captains commanded the remaining companies. Company officers consisted of a lieutenant, an ensign (who carried the company colour with the pikes) and two sergeants (responsible for musket drill).
Although part of a regiment, individual captains held commissions to recruit, equip and maintain their companies. They had to bear the financial risk when pay from king or parliament was inevitably in arrears. In some cases, they were still referred to as private companies. This is key to understanding the apparent ill-discipline of the time, when troops were unpaid and hungry.
On the battlefield, companies grouped together to form a battaile or battalion. The pike divisions massed to form a single stand or block of pikes. The two musketeer divisions of a company formed a plotoon. These deployed to form two wings of shot that normally flanked the pike block.
Pike and Shot warfare theory allowed a fully manned foot regiment to field two battalions. In practice, regiments rarely had the strength to form more than one. Increasingly, as the war progressed, regiments had to be combined to form a single battalion. The minimum strength of a battalion seems to have been about 400, the ideal 600.
The Battle of Edgehill – Dutch Tertias and Swedish Brigades
At Edgehill, the parliamentary foot battalions deployed in three Dutch style tertias (thirds). Each tertia consisted of four battalions; one forward, two in second line and a fourth in reserve. The three tertias of a Dutch army deployed in line, vanguard (right), main (middle) and rear-guard (left). Like the Roman quincunx, these formed a checkerboard of battalions in three offset lines.
Prince Rupert had studied Gustavus’ tactics. Under his influence, the King’s foot deployed in 5 (smaller) Swedish style brigades. These also consisted of four battalions in diamond formation. However, these battalions were considerably smaller than those of Essex’s army. De Gomme’s map of the royalist deployment shows the King’s foot clearly, in tighter offensive (attack) formation. The fourth pike blocks have closed up and the musketeer wings have dropped back, in reserve.
Horse Troops, Squadrons and Regiments
As was normal for the period, at Edgehill, brigades of horse deployed on the flanks of each army. De Gomme shows the King’s horse drawn up in two lines of squadrons, each of two to three troops. The parliamentary horse seem to have operated as individual troops. On their left flank plotoons of musketeers deployed between troops of horse.
In theory, a troop of horse consisted of 72 rank and file (69 troopers and 3 corporals). These made up three divisions, under a captain, a lieutenant and a cornet. However, numbers were often in the mid-forties. The files of an English horse troop were, in theory, six deep. However, civil war troops generally drew up in half files of three deep for battle. The order of precedence between the ranks was: 1, 3, 2.
More English Civil War Historical Notes & Maps
I hope you found this article on Climate Change and The General Crisis of the 17th Century useful. This website also includes pages on the crisis facing Early Modern Britain in the 1640s, the English Revolution and Great Rebellion of 1642.
You may want to read about Pike and Shot Warfare in the 17th Century and how the Dutch and Swedish military doctrines came to clash at the Battle of Edgehill in 1642. More articles can be found on the Battle of Edgehill, the Battle of Lansdown Hill, the Battle of Roundway Down, and more.
You can also read about 17th Century Military Theory. This article explains the clash between Dutch and Swedish military doctrines at Edgehill in 1642. More articles on the Wars of Religion and The Thirty Years War are also at Notes and Maps.
Divided Kingdom – English Civil War historical fiction
These historical notes accompany the text of the English Civil War historical fiction series Divided Kingdom by Charles Cordell. These include the novel God’s Vindictive Wrath which opens at the Battle of Edgehill in 1642. It includes accounts of the Battle of Aylesbury and the Battle of Brentford.
The Divided Kingdom books take a fresh approach. They are not based on a single hero. They do not take sides. Their voices – ordinary men and women – face each other in the chaos of Britain in civil war. They are both relatable and sharply relevant today. They are also as historically accurate as is possible.
Please do check out some of the writing at Divided Kingdom Books, including book tasters and a FREE ebook short story.
See More & Share
This website also includes posts on Early Modern history, Living History and re-enactment at News & Events. You may also wish to read about the English Civil War history talks and battlefield walks I give.
Alternatively, visit Facebook, Instagram or Twitter for more posts on my historical research, Living History and English Civil War fiction. These include upcoming events and opportunities to meet. Just follow on social media at #DividedKingdomBooks on:
If you want even more, why not join us in the Divided Kingdom Readers’ Club. You will receive a monthly email direct from me in which I share more notes from my research. If you think this is for you, click the link and join the Clubmen.
Spread the Word
If you think others will like what you see, please share via email or your social media:
Alternatively, return to the site Home Page for information about Charles Cordell, latest posts and links to books.